![vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light](https://docs.chaos.com/download/attachments/60101260/Light_tree.jpg)
- Vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light how to#
- Vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light pro#
- Vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light software#
In fact I would even argue that your comparison of Lumion 9 with ANY of the other renderers there (with perhaps the exception of Maxwell's GPU mode) makes ZERO sense to me since it's a GPU renderer that necessitates the user having a powerful graphics card while the rest are pretty much ALL CPU renderers and work with vastly different algorithms from GPU renderers.
Vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light software#
So you're comparing Corona for ArchiCAD - which is still an Alpha version, barely even in the second release - to Lumion 9 - a COMPLETE version software which is 9 versions in.and you think this comparison makes sense?
![vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-RXwYKmmiwqk/VmDvRPDyI3I/AAAAAAAAAeo/jmQNtRpFVEY/s1600/final%2B4.jpg)
We need a Benchmark ArchiCAD model to make better comparisons for quality and speed. I like Maxwell Studio best for doing that. Top quality rendering is still all about the materials you use. You can tweak the geometry in Maxwell Studio to make edges sharper or rounder - things like that. Besides, the functionality of Maxwell Studio is not something you can do with Corona, Lumion, CineRender, or Art*Lantis or even ArchiCAD. I am not ready to trade in my Maxell Studio/Render because I can still make better quality images with it and it is actually pretty fast with my GPU NVIDIA P5000 Cuda Cores. But also more difficult to get good results that Lumion which could not be easier. Corona is faster, and has more potential to deliver better quality images.
Vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light how to#
It all depends on how well you know how to use one or the other. No contest there as far as I am concerned.Ĭorona for ArchiCAD is better than CineRender perhaps, but not anything radically better. And the quality is the comparable if not equal, but much, much easier to achieve with Lumion.
Vray 3ds max too many artefacts with vray light pro#
Lumion 9 Pro is perhaps 50 times faster than faster that Art*Lantis 2019. I also have a demo for Art*Lantis 2019 installed. Lumion 9 Pro LiveSynk add-on for ArchiCAD 22 I have installed with the Corona add-on for ArchiCAD, Maxwell Render add-on is for an older version of ArchiCAD. They (currently) have no plans to work on a Revit plugin or port any time soon.Īnd all of this is why we need a Benchmark file. So before long we will have an ArchiCAD-Corona combination to match up to Revit-Vray. Of course it hardly matters now since Chaosgroup (the makers of Vray) bought out the company that makes Corona (even though they're still producing both as separate products).Īlso, if you're not aware, the makers of Corona are actually working on a port or a bridge for ArchiCAD specifically, to their render engine and they even showed off a working demo at a recent user conference complete with a working RT interactive renderer and window porting directly from ArchiCAD's 3D window. Which would be why you're seeing a lot of Vray users jumping ship and switching to Corona. It terms of its simplicity of use, it's speed in many situations, it's post-processing and lens-effects features. Having used both extensively, I have to state that Corona is far superior to Vray in many respects. I really wish ArchiCAD had a port for Vray. About post, for Vray you need only a simple click on a Nick Collection Filter for Photoshop, but for Octane you have to spend too many hours in Photoshop for your final render. I have both, Octane and Vray on another 3D software, and Vray RT GPU is way faster than Octane in many situations, and for other features Vray is way ahead of anything else in the market.